Model comparison

Amazon Nova Pro vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Pro Amazon

31.0

Rank #281 Confirmed

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 34.2 to 27.4.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Pro and Gemma 3n E4b IT specifications
Amazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
ProviderAmazonGoogle
Noometry Index31.037.3
Released2024-12-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window300K—
Max output10K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.80—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked3818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Coding12701268
LiveBench Coding38.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25%—
TheAgentCompany1.7%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts12461284
Kagi LLM Benchmark—31.5%
LiveBench Reasoning32.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.8—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Math12521251
Omni-MATH24.2%—
LiveBench Math38%—

Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Expert12111246
Humanity's Last Exam4.4%—
MMLU-Pro67.3%—
Confabulations30.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
GPQA (HELM)44.6%—
MMLU82%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Vision980—

Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Non-English12341285
LMArena Chinese12441309
LMArena French12711330
LMArena German12431311
LMArena Japanese12001272
LMArena Korean12031259
LMArena Russian12401288
LMArena Spanish11821305

Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Instruction Following12351255
LiveBench Instruction Following67.1%—
IFEval81.5%—

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Longer Query12551276

Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Text12591306
LMArena Creative Writing12121287
LMArena Multi-Turn12461276
Short-Story Creative Writing60.5%—
WildBench77.7%—
LiveBench Language37%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Pro or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper