Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 24.9 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2025-05-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 33K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.12 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1318 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1302 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1315 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1272 |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.