Model comparison
MiniMax-M2 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 24.9 to 18.6.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2025-10-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1318 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 61% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1297 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 30% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 160.6 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1357 | 1302 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.8% | — |
Math Too close to call
MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1350 | 1315 |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1336 | 1272 |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1314 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1367 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1336 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1366 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1255 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1326 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | 1275 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1332 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1362 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax-M2 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.