Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 25.5 to 19.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 38.6 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1307 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1286 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1281 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1276 |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1277 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1341 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1284 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.