Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 19.9 to 10.6.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 31.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.