Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3-4B
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 29.7.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 31.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3-4B?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.