Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 34.2.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
ProviderGoogleMiniMax
Noometry Index37.343.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1841

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding12681469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts12841447
SimpleBench—45.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math12511429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Expert12461461
GPQA Diamond—90.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English12851420
LMArena Chinese13091463
LMArena French13301447
LMArena German13111426
LMArena Japanese12721381
LMArena Korean12591372
LMArena Russian12881428
LMArena Spanish13051432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following12551433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query12761445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text13061433
LMArena Creative Writing12871404
LMArena Multi-Turn12761442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiniMax-M3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper