Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 50.1.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1268 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1251 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1246 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1305 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1255 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.