Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Llama 3-8B

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 34.2 to 7.8.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3-8B specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3-8B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index37.325.5
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1834

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Coding12681152
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12841133
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.45
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Math12511151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Expert12461113
GPQA Diamond—26.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English12851098
LMArena Chinese13091076
LMArena French13301159
LMArena German13111104
LMArena Japanese1272967
LMArena Korean12591004
LMArena Russian12881109
LMArena Spanish13051173

Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12551127

Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query12761128

Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text13061166
LMArena Creative Writing12871150
LMArena Multi-Turn12761152

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Llama 3-8B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3-8B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper