Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Llama 3-8B

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

36.8

Rank #202 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.3

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-8B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 35.5 to 7.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Llama 3-8B specifications
Granite 4.1 8bLlama 3-8B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index36.825.3
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—8K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1334

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291), Llama 3-8B: 30.5 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Coding13131152
LMArena WebDev1190—
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142), Llama 3-8B: 13.8 (#321)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12941133
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.33
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167), Llama 3-8B: 8.3 (#317)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Math13111151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#303)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Expert13101113
GPQA Diamond—26.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English12611098
LMArena Chinese13351076
LMArena Russian12381109
LMArena French—1158
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1003
LMArena Spanish—1172

Instruction Following Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198), Llama 3-8B: 58.7 (#255)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12681127

Long Context Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#246)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query12751128

Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199), Llama 3-8B: 37.7 (#251)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text12911166
LMArena Creative Writing12491150
LMArena Multi-Turn12691152

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Llama 3-8B?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.9 vs 30.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Llama 3-8B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper