Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
GoogleSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.1 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1268 |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1251 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1246 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1255 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.