Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Gemma 3n E4b IT and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 5 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 25.0 to 19.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 37.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1270 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1264 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1274 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1248 |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1245 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Gemma 3n E4b IT and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.0 vs 37.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.