Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Step 3.7 Flash
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 35.6.
- Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.