Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs MiniMax-M2

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 25.5 to 19.4.
  • MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index38.637.4
Released—2025-10-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Coding13071370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
LMArena WebDev—1297

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Hard Prompts12861357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Math12811352

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert12761337

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English12651313
LMArena Chinese13461366
LMArena Russian12661331
LMArena French—1335
LMArena German—1355
LMArena Spanish—1326

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following12771328

Long Context Too close to call

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query13411331

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Text12881340
LMArena Creative Writing12641286
LMArena Multi-Turn12841361

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than MiniMax-M2?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper