Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 29.0 to 11.8.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index28.130.8
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked2213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Coding12301090
BigCodeBench Instruct—20.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12531073
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA2.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02—

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Math12391117
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%—

Knowledge Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert12231064
GPQA Diamond23.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12731033
LMArena Russian12941045
LMArena Chinese—1070
LMArena German1281—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12391056

Long Context Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12731070

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Text12911080
LMArena Creative Writing12711046
LMArena Multi-Turn12551053
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 4B or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper