Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Ministral 8B

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.2

Rank #284 Confirmed

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

27.8

Rank #321 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Ministral 8B in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 28.4 to 12.5.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Ministral 8B specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructMinistral 8B
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index30.227.8
Released—2024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.10
Results tracked1317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Ministral 8B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311), Ministral 8B: 34.4 (#226)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMinistral 8B
LMArena Coding10901202
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, Ministral 8B: 16.2 (#140)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMinistral 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—11.1%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234), Ministral 8B: 17.7 (#279)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMinistral 8B
LMArena Hard Prompts10731191
DTBench—45.7%

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215), Ministral 8B: 23.7 (#262)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMinistral 8B
LMArena Math11171188
MATH Level 5—14.9%

Knowledge Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238), Ministral 8B: 12.5 (#292)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMinistral 8B
LMArena Expert10641170
GPQA Diamond—27.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%

Multilingual Ministral 8B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273), Ministral 8B: 35.3 (#242)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMinistral 8B
LMArena Non-English10331165
LMArena Chinese10701193
LMArena Russian10451195

Instruction Following Ministral 8B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279), Ministral 8B: 60.7 (#245)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMinistral 8B
LMArena Instruction Following10561161

Long Context Ministral 8B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263), Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMinistral 8B
LMArena Longer Query10711212

Writing & Preference Ministral 8B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287), Ministral 8B: 39.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMinistral 8B
LMArena Text10801191
LMArena Creative Writing10461175
LMArena Multi-Turn10531166

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Ministral 8B?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Ministral 8B better for coding?

Ministral 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Ministral 8B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper