Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen1.5-14B
Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-14B leads 29.3 to 7.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 32.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1138 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Qwen1.5-14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-14B leads
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
Math Qwen1.5-14B leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1125 |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-14B leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1147 |
| LMArena French | — | 1115 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1102 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen1.5-14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.