Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.