Model comparison
Mistral 7B vs Qwen1.5-14B
Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-14B leads 32.4 to 8.1.
Side by side
| Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 23.0 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-27 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 37 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1082 | 1138 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 19.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 27.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 36% | — |
| MBPP+ | 42.1% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1067 | 1113 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 47.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 56.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.21 | — |
| HellaSwag | 81% | — |
| PIQA | 83% | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.3% | — |
Math Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1085 | 1125 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.7% | — |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1094 |
| MMLU | 62.5% | 68.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 15.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 87.4% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 79.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 75.2% | — |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1012 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1009 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1037 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 987 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 878 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1018 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1026 | 1085 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1102 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1060 | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1090 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1068 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral 7B better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mistral 7B or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.1 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Qwen1.5-14B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.