Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 36.1 to 7.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.