Model comparison
Mistral 7B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 35.4 to 7.3.
Side by side
| Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 22.9 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2023-09-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 37 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral 7B: 25.9 (#321), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1082 | 1346 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 19.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 27.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 36% | — |
| MBPP+ | 42.1% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral 7B: 12.6 (#331), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1067 | 1322 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 47.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 56.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.97 | — |
| HellaSwag | 81% | — |
| PIQA | 83% | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.3% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral 7B: 7.6 (#319), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1085 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.7% | — |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral 7B: 7.3 (#306), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1307 |
| GPQA Diamond | 15.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 87.4% | — |
| MMLU | 62.5% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 79.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 75.2% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral 7B: 26.0 (#278), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1012 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1009 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1036 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 987 | 1283 |
| LMArena Russian | 1018 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1026 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 878 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral 7B: 54.5 (#275), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1298 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#266), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1060 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral 7B: 30.9 (#281), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1090 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1068 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral 7B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mistral 7B or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 25.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.