Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4 Fast leads 36.1 to 9.6.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 39.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2025-09-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4 Fast: 32.3 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1160 |
| WeirdML | — | 42.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1429 |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Grok 4 Fast: 29.3 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 15.7% |
| Cybench | — | 30% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
Reasoning Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Grok 4 Fast: 22.5 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 5.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 48.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1413 |
| DTBench | — | 82.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.21 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.5 |
Math Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Grok 4 Fast: 36.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1419 |
Knowledge Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Grok 4 Fast: 31.5 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 19.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1411 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4 Fast: 51.5 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1458 |
| LMArena French | — | 1433 |
| LMArena German | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1414 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4 Fast: 73.4 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1388 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4 Fast: 60.2 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1414 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Grok 4 Fast?
Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Grok 4 Fast share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.