Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.6 to 7.1.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1270 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1264 |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1245 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.