Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Llama 3.2 1B
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.2 1B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 34.2 to 7.2.
- Llama 3.2 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 20.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 60K |
| Max output | — | 54K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.027 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1070 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 8.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 11.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10.8% |
| BALROG | — | 6.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1044 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 101.99 |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1086 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1007 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.9% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 941 |
| LMArena German | — | 1014 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1031 |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1050 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1055 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1030 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 200 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Llama 3.2 1B?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Llama 3.2 1B better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Llama 3.2 1B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.