Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.0 to 7.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1294 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1246 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.