Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

21.1

Rank #353 Reported

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 40.4 to 7.0.
  • Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent specifications
Gemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index21.146.2
Released2025-03-122026-03-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Coding—1457

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%—
LMArena Search—1204

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1448

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
LMArena Math—1442

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
GPQA Diamond19.9%—
LMArena Expert—1445

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English—1440
LMArena Chinese—1475
LMArena French—1466
LMArena German—1456
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1447

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following—1420

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query—1431

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text—1450
LMArena Creative Writing—1436
LMArena Multi-Turn—1452

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper