Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Inkling-Small
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling-Small leads 48.2 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 90% for Inkling-Small.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 46.5 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 1.05M |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.45 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1409 |
| SciCode | — | 48.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1451 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Inkling-Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 18% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 40.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 84% |
| CritPt | — | 8.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1423 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.15 |
Math Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 90% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 46.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1459 |
Knowledge Inkling-Small leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 88.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1442 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1235 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1402 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1436 |
| LMArena German | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1428 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1399 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1401 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1414 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1331 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1491 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Inkling-Small?
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Inkling-Small share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.