Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 5 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 12B leads 45.7 to 25.2.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index32.129.7
Released2025-03-122024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding12811039
SciCode17.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13091028
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5—

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math13071089
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1248984
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13181000
LMArena German13701006
LMArena Russian13351004
LMArena Chinese—1016
LMArena French—1039
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12991023

Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1317996

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text13341050
LMArena Creative Writing13311024
LMArena Multi-Turn1334989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 3 12B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.7 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper