Model comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3 12B leads 26.5 to 18.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | — |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.49 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | — |
| LMArena German | 1370 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 12B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 12B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Gemma 3 12B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.