Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 2 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1028 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1089 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1023 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 996 |
Writing & Preference Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.