Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 29.4 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 73.7% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 45 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | 15.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | 31.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | — |
| LMArena French | 1302 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.7% | 73% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 81.3% | 68.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.