Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 42.9 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
Reasoning Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.