Model comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 22.3.
- Gemma 3 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | 1319 |
| SciCode | 17.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | 1308 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.5 | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1285 |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1358 |
| LMArena German | 1370 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1278 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | 1303 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 12B better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 12B or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.