Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Gemma 3 12B

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale DeepSeek

39.7

Rank #162 Reported

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3 12B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 15.7.
  • Gemma 3 12B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
  • Gemma 3 12B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemma 3 12B specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index39.732.1
Released2025-12-012025-03-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K131K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.58$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$1.68$0.15
Results tracked324

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
SciCode—17.4%
WeirdML46.7%—
LMArena Coding—1281

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—30.4%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
SimpleBench52.6%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1309
DTBench—48.8%
LMCA—4.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—123.5

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.7%
LMArena Math—1307

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
GPQA Diamond—39.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.4%
LMArena Expert—1248

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
MindCube—46.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
LMArena Non-English—1318
LMArena German—1370
LMArena Russian—1335

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
LMArena Instruction Following—1299

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
LMArena Longer Query—1317

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGemma 3 12B
EQ-Bench Creative Writing12761126
LMArena Text—1334
LMArena Creative Writing—1331
LMArena Multi-Turn—1334

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Gemma 3 12B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Gemma 3 12B?

Gemma 3 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Gemma 3 12B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 3 12B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemma 3 12B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper