Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Gemma 3 12B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3 12B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 15.7.
- Gemma 3 12B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
- Gemma 3 12B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 32.1 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 17.4% |
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1281 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 30.4% |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1309 |
| DTBench | — | 48.8% |
| LMCA | — | 4.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 123.5 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.7% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1307 |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 39.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | — | 46.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1318 |
| LMArena German | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1335 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1317 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | 1126 |
| LMArena Text | — | 1334 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1334 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Gemma 3 12B?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Gemma 3 12B?
Gemma 3 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Gemma 3 12B better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 3 12B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemma 3 12B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.