Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
TencentSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 50.2 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1308 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1273 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1278 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1303 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.