Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Gemma 2B and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 6 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1016 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 993 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1018 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 947 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Gemma 2B and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 2B or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.4 vs 29.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.