Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Magistral Small
Gemma 2B and Magistral Small score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 2 categories and Magistral Small in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 2B leads 18.8 to 6.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Small leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 133.19 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Magistral Small?
Gemma 2B and Magistral Small score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 2B or Magistral Small better for coding?
Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Magistral Small share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.