Model comparison
Llama 3.1-70B vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Llama 3.1-70B and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-70B scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 7b Instruct leads 30.2 to 13.5.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1-70B | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2024-07-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1260 | 1016 |
| WeirdML | 9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 6.9% | — |
| BALROG | 27.9% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1-70B leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | 993 |
| DTBench | 60% | — |
| LMCA | 14.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.92 | — |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1018 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 21% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 36.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 44.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 65.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 42.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1209 | — |
| MMLU | 80.1% | — |
Multilingual Llama 3.1-70B leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1219 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1215 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1261 | — |
| LMArena German | 1222 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1253 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1-70B leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1231 | 978 |
| IFEval | 82.1% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1241 | — |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1-70B leads
Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1261 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1232 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1256 | 1007 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 784 | — |
| WildBench | 75.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1-70B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Llama 3.1-70B and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama 3.1-70B or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (30.3 vs 29.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-70B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.