Model comparison

Gemma 2B vs GPT-4.5

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2B Google

29.6

Rank #307 Confirmed

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and GPT-4.5 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-4.5 leads 56.9 to 24.0.
  • Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2B and GPT-4.5 specifications
Gemma 2BGPT-4.5
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index29.637.2
Released2024-02-212025-02-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2342

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-4.5
LMArena Coding10101396
Aider Polyglot—44.9%
WeirdML—39.4%
LiveBench Coding—75.2%
HumanEval+20.7%—
MBPP+34.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-4.5
Cybench—17.5%

Reasoning Gemma 2B leads

Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-4.5
LMArena Hard Prompts9891403
Epoch Capabilities Index94.2136.74
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—34.5%
ARC-AGI-1—10.3%
EnigmaEval—3.2%
LiveBench Reasoning—71.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—64.3%
BIG-Bench Hard35.2%—
ForecastBench—61.7
HellaSwag71.4%—
LiveBench—69%
PIQA77.3%—
WinoGrande65.4%—

Math GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-4.5
LMArena Math10091412
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—37.8%
LiveBench Math—69.3%
MATH Level 5—78.6%
GSM8K17.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-4.5
GPQA Diamond—68.7%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.4%
Confabulations—13.6%
LMArena Expert—1394
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.1%—
BoolQ69.4%—
MMLU42.3%—
TriviaQA53.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-4.5
LMArena Vision—1195
VPCT—45%

Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-4.5
LMArena Non-English9581413
LMArena Chinese9861421
LMArena Russian9371419
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1457
LMArena Japanese—1416
LMArena Korean—1392

Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-4.5
LMArena Instruction Following9701404
LiveBench Instruction Following—72.3%

Long Context GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-4.5
LMArena Longer Query9811406
Fiction.LiveBench—63.9%

Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads

Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-4.5
LMArena Text10021417
LMArena Creative Writing9871394
LMArena Multi-Turn9451444
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1258
LiveBench Language—61.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2B better than GPT-4.5?

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2B or GPT-4.5 better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and GPT-4.5 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper