Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 30.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.