Model comparison

Gemma 2 2b IT vs GPT-4.1 nano

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

33.1

Rank #248 Confirmed

GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI

27.9

Rank #327 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 5 categories and GPT-4.1 nano in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 21.4 to 8.5.
  • Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 2b IT and GPT-4.1 nano specifications
Gemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index33.127.9
Released—2025-04-14
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1738

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
LMArena Coding11121306
Aider Polyglot—8.9%
SciCode—25.9%
WeirdML—19%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—33%

Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
LMArena Hard Prompts11131286
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—33.3%
ARC-AGI-1—0%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—52.5%
LMCA—5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.62

Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
LMArena Math11351274
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—28.9%
Omni-MATH—36.7%
MATH Level 5—70%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1%

Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
LMArena Expert10961272
GPQA Diamond—48.9%
SimpleQA Verified—6%
MMLU-Pro—55%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
LMArena Vision—1063

Multilingual GPT-4.1 nano leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
LMArena Non-English11211260
LMArena Chinese11321270
LMArena German11141288
LMArena Japanese10831198
LMArena Russian11181261
LMArena French1157—
LMArena Korean1055—
LMArena Spanish1140—

Instruction Following GPT-4.1 nano leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
LMArena Instruction Following11181267
IFEval—84.3%

Long Context Gemma 2 2b IT leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
LMArena Longer Query11301283
Fiction.LiveBench—25%

Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 nano leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGPT-4.1 nano
LMArena Text11561285
LMArena Creative Writing11471260
LMArena Multi-Turn11181277
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—946
WildBench—81.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than GPT-4.1 nano?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 2b IT or GPT-4.1 nano better for coding?

Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and GPT-4.1 nano share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 nano has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper