Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 43.4 to 36.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 35.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1223 |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1203 |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1230 |
Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1167 |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1201 |
Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.6 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.