Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Wizardlm 70b
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 43.4 to 34.8.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | 1081 |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1203 | 1079 |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1230 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1180 | 1052 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | 1093 |
Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Wizardlm 70b?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.6 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.