Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs Gemma 2 2b IT
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 38.1 to 32.3.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 33.1 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1112 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1113 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1135 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1096 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | 1157 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1140 |
Instruction Following Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1118 |
Long Context Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1130 |
Writing & Preference Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1118 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Gemma 2 2b IT?
Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?
Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Gemma 2 2b IT share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.