Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 36.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1396 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1425 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.