Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.4

Rank #312 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 39.1 to 10.7.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.65 / $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 8K.
  • Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index29.443.6
Released2024-06-242026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window8K262K
Max output2K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.65$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.65$0.28
Results tracked3418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding12111466
BigCodeBench Instruct42.8%—
LiveBench Coding36%—
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts11981445
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench48%—
LiveBench Data Analysis47.9%—
LMCA7.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.08—
LiveBench38.2%—

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math12121430
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.4%—
LiveBench Math26.5%—
MATH Level 527.9%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert11721449
GPQA Diamond36.5%—
Confabulations27.1%—
MMLU75.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English12171404
LMArena Chinese12211465
LMArena French12471447
LMArena German12091399
LMArena Japanese11751317
LMArena Korean11741355
LMArena Russian12341412
LMArena Spanish12281434

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following12061428
LiveBench Instruction Following58.1%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query12311442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text12311423
LMArena Creative Writing12411392
LMArena Multi-Turn12241445
LiveBench Language32.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B lists at $0.65 and $0.65.

Is Gemma 2 27B or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper