Model comparison
DBRX vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 33.6.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1466 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1445 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1430 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1449 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
DBRX: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.