Model comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.2

Rank #302 Confirmed

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo Moonshot AI

45.4

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 45.5 to 10.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.4% for Gemma 2 27B and 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.

Side by side

Gemma 2 27B and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo specifications
Gemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index29.245.4
Released2024-06-242025-11-06
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window8K—
Max output2K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.65—
Output $ / M tokens$0.65—
Results tracked3421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Coding12111454
LMArena WebDev—1322
BigCodeBench Instruct42.8%—
LiveBench Coding36%—
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—

Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts11991428
Chess Puzzles—20%
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench48%—
LiveBench Data Analysis47.9%—
LMCA7.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.06—
LiveBench38.2%—

Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.4%83.1%
LMArena Math12121429
LiveBench Math26.5%—
MATH Level 527.9%—

Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
GPQA Diamond36.5%84.2%
LMArena Expert11721439
Confabulations27.1%—
MMLU75.7%—

Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Non-English12171398
LMArena Chinese12211457
LMArena French12461425
LMArena German12091390
LMArena Japanese11751356
LMArena Korean11741329
LMArena Russian12341390
LMArena Spanish12281407

Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following12061403
LiveBench Instruction Following58.1%—

Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Longer Query12311415

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads

Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BKimi K2 Thinking Turbo
LMArena Text12311415
LMArena Creative Writing12411373
LMArena Multi-Turn12241414
LiveBench Language32.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 27B or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper