Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 45.5 to 13.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 45.4 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| WeirdML | 19.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1428 |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 83.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1429 |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1439 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | — |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1274 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1407 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1403 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1414 |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.