Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.0 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1039 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1028 |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1089 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 984 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1016 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | 1039 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | 1059 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1023 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 996 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.